Internal tools platform · Ranked 17 of 33 in the index
Softr Review (2026)
Builds client portals, directories and internal tools on top of Airtable, Google Sheets or its own tables, with permissions and gated pages set up in an afternoon.
3.8 / 5Last verified: · Next scheduled check: The quick answer
Assessed for 2026Excellent at one job and honest about it. If your data is already in Airtable and you need a gated portal your clients can log into, Softr gets you there faster than anything else in the index, with permissions that behave. It is also more programmable than we previously published: a REST API and an MCP server are available from the entry paid tier, with the vendor's own caveat that certain endpoints may be limited to higher plans. The commercial shape is the thing to understand before you commit. Softr meters two seat axes at once, builders and app users, on top of record and action caps, so a portal gets more expensive precisely as its audience grows. And there is no code export at all: no source to take away and no migration path off the platform, which is why code ownership sits at 2.1. AI credits are 5 a month on Free and 10 on Basic, which makes the AI co-builder a demo rather than a working method at those tiers. Rent it for a portal. Do not build a product on it.
- Best for
- Client portals, membership directories and internal views over data that already lives in Airtable
- Not for
- Products with their own data model, or anything that has to scale past a few thousand active users
- Price from
- USD 19 / month, billed monthlyBasic plan.
- Free tier
- Yes
The ten axes
Every builder in the index is scored on the same ten axes with the same published weights. This is how Softr performed on our test briefs.
- Reliability16%
- 4.1
- Integrations16%
- 4.2
- SEO and GEO13%
- n/a, not applicable
- Design quality12%
- 3.9
- Agent performance10%
- 3.2
- Speed9%
- 3.7
- Value9%
- 3.9
- Scalability7%
- 3.1
- API and MCP access5%
- 3.9
- Code ownership3%
- 2.1
n/a means the axis does not apply to this tool. It builds internal software behind a login, a native store app or an API, so there are no public crawlable pages to test. The axis is left out of the overall rating and the remaining weights are renormalised, rather than the tool being scored down for something we did not test.
Every axis is scored from 0 to 5 stars. The percentage is that axis's published weight in the overall 3.8 rating.
The verdict
Excellent at one job and honest about it. If your data is already in Airtable and you need a gated portal your clients can log into, Softr gets you there faster than anything else in the index, with permissions that behave. It is also more programmable than we previously published: a REST API and an MCP server are available from the entry paid tier, with the vendor's own caveat that certain endpoints may be limited to higher plans. The commercial shape is the thing to understand before you commit. Softr meters two seat axes at once, builders and app users, on top of record and action caps, so a portal gets more expensive precisely as its audience grows. And there is no code export at all: no source to take away and no migration path off the platform, which is why code ownership sits at 2.1. AI credits are 5 a month on Free and 10 on Basic, which makes the AI co-builder a demo rather than a working method at those tiers. Rent it for a portal. Do not build a product on it.
Builds client portals, directories and internal tools on top of Airtable, Google Sheets or its own tables, with permissions and gated pages set up in an afternoon.
The dissenting view
One panellist argued the value score is too low given how much consulting work a Softr portal displaces. The majority held the mark because the free plan stops at three builders, five app users and 5K records, so a real deployment is on a paid tier immediately.
One member of the panel disagreed with the consensus. We publish the disagreement rather than average it away.
What it looks like
Pricing
Apps, databases, workflows and forms are unlimited on every tier including Free. What Free limits is builders (3), app users (5), database records (5K) and workflow actions (500 a month). Paid plans from USD 19 a month.
| Plan | Price | Billing | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | monthly | Unlimited apps, 3 builders, 5 app users, 5K records, 500 workflow actions a month |
| Basic | USD 19 | monthly | Custom domain, user groups, more records |
| Professional | Not captured | monthly | More app users, charts, API integrationsPlan exists, price not captured in our 19 and 20 August 2026 check. |
We list the plans we could verify on the vendor's own pricing page. Where a plan exists but its price was not published in a form we could capture, the row says so rather than carrying a number we cannot source.
Feature by feature
The same eleven checks, run on every builder in the index.
| Capability | Status |
|---|---|
| Full-stack backend | No, front end over a data source |
| Database included | Yes, or connect Airtable and Sheets |
| Auth included | Yes, with user groups and gated pages |
| Code export | No, none at all, and no migration path off the platform |
| GitHub sync | No |
| One-click deploy | Yes |
| Custom domain | Yes, paid plans |
| Mobile or native output | Responsive web and PWA |
| Team collaboration | Yes |
| Public API or MCP server | Yes, REST API and MCP server from the entry paid tier, with the vendor noting certain endpoints may be limited to higher plans |
| Self-hosting the output | No |
What works / What does not
What works
- Fastest route from an existing Airtable base to a logged-in client portal
- REST API and an MCP server from the entry paid tier, with some endpoints limited to higher plans
- User groups and gated pages work correctly without configuration archaeology
- Good-looking blocks that need almost no design input
What does not
- Two seat axes billed at once, builders and app users, plus record and action caps, so the bill grows with your audience
- No code export at all, no source to take away and no migration path off the platform, which is what 2.1 on code ownership means
- AI credits are 5 a month on Free and 10 on Basic, enough for a demo rather than a working method
- Record and user limits shape the product more than your requirements do
User reviews
Softr holds 26 star ratings and 3 written reviews. They are counted separately: every written review carries a rating, but most ratings arrive without one. Editor panel reviews are shown first and badged.
Community rating
- 5 ★50%
- 4 ★27%
- 3 ★8%
- 2 ★4%
- 1 ★12%
Sign in to rate Softr. Reading needs no account.
Write a review of Softr
You need an account to post, because one rating per person is the only way the averages mean anything. Reading never needs one.
- Editor panel
Client portal live in a day, and the permissions were right
Aoife Brennan@aoifebrennan
Independent consultant. I have built the same client portal on four different platforms.
The data was already in Airtable. I had a branded portal with per-client access working before lunch on day two, and the user groups behaved exactly as documented, which is not something I say often. For consultancy work where the portal is a deliverable rather than the product, this is the fastest honest answer.
- Pros
- Extremely fast from existing Airtable data. Permissions behave.
- Cons
- Entry price is high for what is essentially a front end.
0 replies
No replies yet.
Sign in to reply.
- Editor panel
The record limits designed our product for us
Ingrid Halvorsen@ingridhalvorsen
Data analyst who ended up owning three internal dashboards and a lot of opinions.
We grew past the tier limits twice in six months and both times the upgrade was driven by row counts rather than anything we wanted. Performance also softened noticeably as the base grew. It is a good tool for a portal that stays a portal. Ours did not, and that was our misjudgement more than theirs.
- Pros
- Very quick to build and easy to hand to a colleague.
- Cons
- Row and user limits drive cost more than features do.
0 replies
No replies yet.
Sign in to reply.
- Editor panel
Our grant reporting portal, built by someone non-technical
Laila Benali@lailabenali
Programme coordinator at a non-profit. Every tool I choose has to survive a grant audit.
I am not an engineer and I built the whole thing. Partners log in, see only their own projects and upload documents. Passed our funder audit without a comment. The price is a real consideration for a non-profit budget, and I wish the free tier allowed one gated page.
- Pros
- Achievable without any technical background. Audit-friendly access control.
- Cons
- Expensive relative to a non-profit budget.
0 replies
No replies yet.
Sign in to reply.
Frequently asked
- Does Softr need Airtable?
- Not any more, it has its own tables, but the Airtable path is still where it is strongest and where most of the integration work has gone.
- Does Softr have an API or an MCP server?
- Both, from the entry paid tier, with the vendor's own caveat that certain endpoints may be limited to higher plans.
- Can you export a Softr app?
- No. There is no code export of any kind and no migration path off the platform, which is the whole reason code ownership scores 2.1. Plan to rebuild if you ever leave.
- Softr or Glide?
- Softr for web portals and client-facing directories. Glide for internal, mobile-shaped tools your staff use on a phone.
Sources
Where these numbers come from
- Price
- Softr pricing page · 14 August 2026
- Axis scores
- Our own testing panel: six briefs, three runs each, eighteen runs per tool, scored against the published rubric · 20 August 2026
- Community rating
- Computed from the 26 star ratings held in our own database for this tool · 20 August 2026
Everything we read for this review
- Softr product site · 14 August 2026
- Softr pricing page · 14 August 2026